Current surgical instrument labeling techniques may increase the risk of unintentionally retained foreign objects: a hypothesis

BACKGROUND Marking of surgical instruments is essential to ensure their proper identification after sterile processing. The National Quality Forum defines unintentionally retained foreign objects in a surgical patient as a serious reportable event also called "never event." PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize that established practices of surgical instrument identification using unkempt tape labels and plastic tags may expose patients to "never events" from retained disintegrating labels. TESTING OF THE HYPOTHESIS We demonstrate the near miss of a "never event" during a surgical case in which the breakage of an instrument label remained initially unwitnessed. A fragment of the plastic label was accidentally found in the wound upon closing. Further clinical testing of the occurrence of this "never event" appears not feasible. As the name implies a patient should never be exposed to the risk of fragmenting labels. IMPLICATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS Current practice does not mandate verifying intact instrument markers as part of the instrument count. The clinical confirmation of our hypothesis mandates a change in perioperative practice: Mechanical labels need to undergo routine inspection and maintenance. The perioperative count must not only verify the quantity of surgical instruments but also the intactness of labels to ensure that no part of an instrument is left behind. Proactive maintenance of taped and dipped labels should be performed routinely. The implementation of newer labeling technologies - such as laser engraved codes - appears to eliminate risks seen in traditional mechanical labels.This article reviews current instrument marking technologies, highlights shortcomings and recommends safe instrument handling and marking practices implementing newer available technologies.